/>

When what ails lies within

Varsities in the State need to adopt the Choice-Based Credit System from the coming academic year, but teaching community and implementers know little of the system.

Updated - November 07, 2016 10:36 pm IST - HYDERABAD:

Though the Choice-Based Credit System is to be put in practice from the coming academic year, it is yet to take off among an apprehensive teaching community and implementers who know little about its procedures.

Teachers and students think the CBCS is being thrust on them without realising that such academic initiatives are mandatory and legally binding as per a UNESCO agreement, to which India is a signatory.

The Telangana Government had constituted an expert committee that framed guidelines and submitted recommendations, suggesting implementation in phases. It had also put a cap of 30 hours of instruction a week. The recommendations are being discussed at the internal meetings of the varsities.

Such discussions at the Osmania University revealed that variations in the process of assigning credits among departments and varsities could hamper the process. In fact, OU had tried the system in 2010 itself, but hit a road block in the lack of a coordinator to oversee its implementation.

“Every department was following its own norms in offering credits and awarding them as per their wish and lacked uniformity,” said the varsity’s Dean (UGC) A. Ravindranath.

Such a system would pose problems for students planning to move to a university midway through their course. The lack of uniformity in credits in the same course may only create more hurdles in obtaining a degree.

In fact, UGC has also not specified the number of credits each course should have. Credits have been suggested only for core subjects and electives, while nothing has been mandated for foundation courses.

Such loopholes have to be plugged first, say academics wishing to remain anonymous.

Moreover, the reluctance of teachers to accept the new system is another issue that could impede the CBCS’ implementation. Improving infrastructure to meet the course demands is another decisive factor.

The report of the expert committee also suggested that the university, constituent and autonomous colleges adopt it first followed by accredited and affiliated colleges.

THE HURDLES

*Lack of uniformity among departments and varsities in awarding credits

*UGC has suggested credits only for core subjects and electives, not for foundation courses

Every department was following its own norms in offering credits and awarding them as per their wish and lacked uniformity

- Prof. A. Ravindranath

Osmania University Dean (UGC)

*Teachers reluctant to move to a new system, hesitant to accept students from other departments

* Universities also need to provide the support infrastructure that CBCS requires

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.