Philippine court urged to block US defence pact

Updated - November 16, 2021 07:18 pm IST - MANILA

Two former senators, lawyers and activists asked the Philippine Supreme Court on Monday to rule on the constitutionality of an agreement with the United States that gives the >American militar y greater access to bases across the country. They also urged the court to halt the pact’s implementation until it issues a ruling.

The Enhanced Defence Cooperation Agreement signed hours before a visit last month by President Barack Obama will allow thousands of U.S. troops to be temporarily based in Philippines for the first time in more than 20 years, signalling closer cooperation in the allies’ hot-and-cold relationship that has been shaped over the decades by war, terrorism and now, jitters over China’s growing military might and assertiveness.

Former Senators Rene Saguisag and Wigberto Tanada two of 12 senators who voted to kick the U.S. military bases out of the Philippines in 1991 and 10 taxpayers filed the petition, suing five officials including President Benigno Aquino III’s defence, foreign affairs, budget and executive secretaries and the armed forces chief of staff for abuse of discretion.

The petition says the 10-year agreement violates the constitutional ban against the presence of foreign military bases or troops in the country except under a treaty approved by two-thirds of all Senate members. The constitution also says if Congress requires, the agreement should be ratified by majority of Filipinos in a referendum, and recognized as a treaty by the other contracting state.

“Not only is the EDCA a violation of the Philippine Constitution, it also does not provide any substantial, long-term real benefit, much less distinct advantage or improvement in our position vis-a-vis the United States,” the petition said.

It said the agreement was wrongly framed as a furtherance of the 1951 Mutual Defence Treaty and the 1998 Visiting Forces Agreement and so evading the constitutional requirement for concurrence of the Senate.

But the petition said the 1951 treaty was superseded by the 1987 Constitution and “its express renunciation of war as an instrument of national policy.” And the presence of U.S. troops under the new agreement goes beyond “visiting,” ruling out the 1998 agreement as an anchor, the petition said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.