|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, July 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
'PM should help ensure transparent AI disinvestment'
By T.S. Shankar
CHENNAI, JULY 18. With the Prime Minister, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee,
convening a high-level meeting in New Delhi on Thursday, to
discuss the ``contentious issues'' relating to Tata Singapore
Airlines, as the single bidder for claiming the Government's
shareholding in Air India (AI), several MPs have sought the
intervention of the PM ``not to allow any clandestine deal'' to
take place in the disinvestment process.
Cutting across party lines, several MPs have shot off hard-
hitting letters to the Prime Minister seeking his immediate
mediation as they are apprehensive that ``norms of transparency
are being ignored''.
They want the Parliament's Standing Committee on Finance be given
adequate time to study the entire issue and send its
observations. Only after obtaining the reactions of the
Parliamentarians, the Government should be allowed to finally
decide on this vital issue.
In a 7-page letter to the Prime Minister, the Congress MP and
Chief Whip, Mr. Priyaranjan Das Munshi, who is also part of the
Standing Committee on Finance, has raised some serious questions
on the single-bidder issue. The letter fears that the long-
winding disinvestment exercise could be heading for a
``clandestine deal''.
The letter, a copy of which was made available to The Hindu
states: ``I am afraid that the property has been grossly under-
valued with a definite design to surrender our sovereign national
interest. I understand the net price is settled at 20 per cent of
the actual value of the property''.
Stating that he had the ``highest admiration for the TATA group
for its outstanding contribution to Indian economy and
professional corporate attitude'', Mr. Dasmunshi has strongly
objected to the ``involvement of Mr. Nimesh Kampani, Chairman of
JM Morgan Stanley Limited for a brief period in TATA managed
India Hotels''.
``Since the inter-evaluation of property is neither known to the
Standing Committee nor the Parliament, would it be proper to
dispose it at this stage. Why not the CAG examine first the
valuation and then Cabinet examine it?,'' he further asked.
Firing yet another salvo, the CPI General Secretary, Mr. A.B.
Bardhan, in a letter to the PM, has asked the ``Disinvestment
Ministry to refrain from taking any final decisions before a
detailed examination takes place of these issues in Parliament
and its concerned Standing Committees''.
Among other vital issues raised by Mr. Bardhan are the
implications of the lack of objectivity, the appropriateness of
handing over the management to a consortium dominated by a
largely Government-owned foreign airline and the measures needed
to protect the interest of the AI employees.
Taking into account the aircraft, maintenance and training
facilities and immovable properties and the opportunities
available to operate additional frequencies and routes besides
its long-term commercial and profit potential, the AI should be
worth at least Rs. 9,000 crores - Rs. 10,000 crores, Mr. Bardhan
felt.
Meanwhile, the Union Disinvestment Minister, Mr. Arun Shourie,
has dispelled the fears raised by Mr. Bardhan. In a reply to the
CPI leader, Mr. Shourie said the Government would uphold the
national interest in every aspect.
Pointing out that the debt equity ratio of AI was 8:1, compared
to the 2:1 ratio of the median Asian Airlines, and its aircraft
utilisation rate was 7.4 to 8 hours a day, a rate at least 30 per
cent less than that of its competitors, Mr. Shourie said AI had
large debts - Rs. 3,250 crores and the interest payment per annum
for loans taken for working capital was more than Rs. 100 crores.
He claimed that the Government was keen on a competitive air
transportation environment to benefit the users by way of lower
fares and quality services.
Hence, there was a need to clearly distinguish between the
Government's regulatory role and AI's commercial interests.
Safeguarding the interests of the people was more important to
the Government than running a high profile company such as AI,
the Minister argued.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Orissa flood situation still grim Next : HC orders status quo in cellular phone case | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|