|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, July 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
New twist to search for CBI chief
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, JULY 18. The Vajpayee Government's search for a
permanent director for the Central Bureau of Investigation became
further complicated after a minor development yesterday in the
Supreme Court. As a result of a legal move, the man on top of a
short- list of potential nominees remains under a ``judicial
cloud''.
On April 17, a panel, as per a three-year-old Supreme Court
directive, had short-listed three possible officers to succeed
Mr. R.K. Raghavan, who was to retire at the end of that month.
The panel, as per the Supreme Court directive, was headed by the
Central Vigilance Commissioner, Mr. N. Vittal, and included the
Union Home Secretary, Mr. Kamal Pande, and the Personnel
Secretary, Mr. B.B. Tandon.
This panel had short-listed three IPS officers: Mr. H.J. Dora
(A.P. cadre), Mr. J.S. Chaubey (U.P. cadre) and Mr. K.
Chakraborty (Gujarat). The Vittal Commission has devised a
strange argument that it could consider only those officers who
had more than two years left in the service and therefore could
function as the CBI director at least for two years, as per the
1998 Supreme Court directive.
Unfortunately within days of the Vittal panel's labours, Mr. H.J.
Dora, came under a ``judicial cloud''. On April 19, 2001, the
Supreme Court had before it an appeal against an order which had
questioned Mr. Dora's judgment when he was Commissioner of Police
in Hyderabad. The court had held that in its prima facie view Mr.
Dora had exercised his power under Section 20-A of TADA ``in a
very casual manner.''
This stricture was seized upon by the Vajpayee Government to
delay acting on the Vittal panel's list. Instead, it appointed
Mr. R.C. Sharma as the officiating director of the CBI. Mr. Dora
was widely seen as a ``nominee'' of the Chief Minister of Andhra
Pradesh, and it was deemed unwise on the part of the Central
Government to have such an officer in such a crucial position.
Also, there was criticism that the Vittal panel had devised new
rules to keep some officers out of the fray.
Yesterday, the Andhra Pradesh Government withdrew its appeal in
the case between the State of Andhra Pradesh versus Mohammed
Shamsuddin. Since the Additional Solicitor-General did not press
the appeal, the Justice K.T. Thomas-Justice R.P. Sethi Bench
exempted Mr. Dora from making a personal appearance. In other
words, Mr. Dora remains ``strictured''.
Enquiries reveal that the Vajpayee Government would be inclined
to scrap the entire panel. The thinking is that the Prime
Minister has already gone out of his way to propitiate the Andhra
Pradesh Chief Minister by giving an extension to the Cabinet
Secretary. And, in giving this extension, the Union Government
has refuted the Vittal logic.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : CPI(M) concerned over pro-American stand Next : Congress to implement Manmohan panel proposals | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|