|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, July 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Portillo says he feels relieved after defeat
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, JULY 18. In a sensational upset, Mr. Michael Portillo has
crashed out of the Tory leadership contest barely five days after
he emerged as a front-runner and the bookies' favourite to
succeed Mr. William Hague as the party chief.
Equally sensationally, the struggling Mr. Kenneth Clarke has been
catapulted to the top of the table after Tuesday's third and
final round of Tory MPs' ballot to shortlist two candidates, one
of whom would then be elected by the party's 300,000 mass
members. He admitted he was `surprised' by his own performance.
The second candidate on the shortlist is the shadow defence
secretary, Mr. Ian Duncan Smith, a Thatcherite widely seen to be
more in tune with the conservative instincts of the Tory
grassroots than the socially liberal and eurosceptic Mr. Clarke.
His critics portray him as ``Hague without gags'' to emphasise
his lack of charisma compounded by the fact that he even lacks
Mr. Hague's penchant for one-liners and smart repartee.
Stunned by his defeat, Mr. Portillo announced his retirement from
frontline politics saying: ``I think time has come for me to look
for other things to do.'' He ruled out serving in a future shadow
cabinet and said he would rather seek a career in the media or
business, while continuing to be an MP. ``Apart from anything
else, I would just get in their way,'' he said in an acerbic
reference to the new party regime. He would continue to be the
shadow chancellor until a new leader is elected.
Mr. Portillo was the first to throw his hat in the ring when the
leadership race began a few weeks ago after Mr. Hague resigned
taking responsibility for the party's debacle in the general
election, and he led the field consistently despite widespread
scepticism over his conversion from Thatcherism to social
liberalism. He continued to be a favourite even after the more
experienced and charismatic Mr. Clarke belatedly joined the
contest.
In the first two ballots - the second held last Thursday - he got
the highest number of votes followed by Mr. Smith who was eight
votes behind him. Mr. Clarke came a poor third. But a week is a
long time in politics, as Mr. Portillo was to discover.
Three damaging developments destroyed his hopes. First was a
tendentious survey in The Daily Mail which claimed that a
majority of Tory members did not want him to be their leader; the
second was the screening of a video diary secretly filmed by Mr.
Hague's former media chief, Ms. Amanda Platell, during the
election campaign alleging that Mr. Portillo had been disloyal to
Mr. Hague; and the third was a very public and very angry denial
by Mrs. Margaret Thatcher that she supported Mr. Portillo. The
denial followed a front page story in The Sunday Telegraph
quoting a member of Mrs. Thatcher's ``inner circle'' as saying
that she preferred Mr. Portillo to Mr. Smith because she believed
he was more experienced.
According to Mr. Portillo's supporters - derisively nicknamed
`Portillistas' because of his Spanish origin - these developments
took the fight out of him as believed that there were too many
people gunning for him. ``He lost the appetite,'' said one
supporter. Mr. Portillo, trying to make a virtue of his defeat,
said in a way he was relieved because even if he were to win it
would have been with a very narrow margin - not enough to get the
backing for the sort of radical changes that he believed the
party needed in order to become electable again.
The race began with five contenders and while Mr. Michael Ancram,
who had resigned as party's chairman to offer himself as a
`unity' candidate, was eliminated in a previous round Mr. David
Davis widely seen at one stage as a dark horse pulled out after
he did not poll sufficient votes.
The Tories are now confronted with a stark choice in opting for
either Mr. Clarke or Mr. Smith. The contrast between the two -
personality-wise as well as in outlook - could not have been
sharper. Mr. Clarke is a party grandee with years of experience
as a minister in different capacities, whereas Mr. Smith has
never been a minister. Mr. Clarke is an extrovert and a liberal
to his finger tips - and of course deeply eurosceptic. Mr. Smith
is a largely untested commodity, and the closest his supporters
have come to describe him is that he is a ``nice family man''.
His biggest asset in a party which is deeply europhobic is his
own europhobia but critics say even Mr. Hague had loads of it.
That did not help him lead the party to a poll win.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Bush rules out change in stance Next : Washington Post chief Katharine Graham dead | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|