|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, July 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Science & Tech
| Previous
| Next
Climate depends less on the Sun
IF THE Sun got hotter, would we care? Probably not, according to
Hsien-Wang Ou of the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in
Palisades, New York. Water, he suggests in the Journal of
Climate, minimises the climatic effects of a cooler or warmer
sun.
The Sun has got about 30 per cent hotter since the world began.
Four billion years ago it was a younger star, and burned less
brightly.
Geological imprints of global temperatures at that time indicate
that our planet was then warm enough to support liquid water.
Global average temperatures seem not to have varied much in
either direction since then.
Somehow the planet has stayed indifferent to the Sun's changes.
Some explain this so-called `faint young sun paradox' by assuming
that the early atmosphere contained more greenhouse gases such as
carbon dioxide, which trapped a greater proportion of solar heat.
Ou thinks that such considerations may not be necessary.
Water alone is enough to buffer the global temperature against
reduced or increased solar heating, he says. Water establishes
lower and upper boundaries on how far the temperature can drift
from today's. Water vapour is, in fact, the most important
greenhouse gas, although unlike carbon dioxide it is not produced
directly in large amounts by human activity.
Most water vapour in the atmosphere is the result of evaporation
from the oceans. As long as the oceans do not freeze, says Ou,
there will always be plenty of water vapour in the air,
mitigating the effect of a dimmer Sun.
As the Sun warms, we might expect the effects of water vapour to
increase, as more water will evaporate and enhance the greenhouse
effect.
In Ou's model, however, clouds counteract such warming. More
water vapour in the air enhances cloud formation; clouds reflect
sunlight, and so can offset an increase in solar output.
Some previous studies have argued that clouds can act as a kind
of climate thermostat. Ou's model treats the climatic effects of
clouds in much more detail. He takes into account the fact that
there are, crudely speaking, two different kinds of cloud high
and low which affect climate differently. Strong updrafts of
warm, moist air form high clouds close to the top of the
troposphere (at a height of about 15 kilometres). Flat, low
clouds form closer to the ground.
In a warmer climate caused by a hotter Sun, high clouds become
less extensive and the amount of low cloud increases, Ou
calculates. Overall, this counteracts warming because of sunlight
reflection.
Even if the Sun became 50 per cent more intense, the average
temperature would rise by only 10 degrees a significant change,
but not nearly as great as that without water's moderating
influence.
However, this is unlikely to be the whole story. Some researchers
believe that all or most of the oceans froze over at some time in
the past.
Ou's model does not apply to an ice-bound planet, and he has not
looked at how increases in other greenhouse gases would effect
global warming.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Science & Tech Previous : Dogs foretell imminent illness episodes in humans Next : Stamp of recent water ice | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|