Weeks after Hathras verdict, a village still divided

The family of the victim said they will move the higher judiciary as justice has not been done; acquaintances of the accused have defended them as they are of the same caste

Updated - April 01, 2023 06:40 pm IST - Hathras (U.P.)

A CRPF post near the residence of the Hathras gang-rape victim’s family.

A CRPF post near the residence of the Hathras gang-rape victim’s family. | Photo Credit: ANUJ KUMAR

It has been weeks since the special judge of an SC/ST court in Hathras pronounced his 167-page judgment in the alleged gang rape of a Dalit girl by four upper caste men on September 14, 2020.

The court convicted the primary accused, Sandeep Sisodia, to life imprisonment under IPC Section 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) and Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, but did not find him guilty of gang rape. The other three accused, Ravi, Lav Kush and Ramu, were acquitted of all charges.

Disquiet in Boolgarhi

However, there is as much disquiet in Boolgarhi village as on September 30, 2020, when the district administration forcibly cremated the victim in the dead of night, after she passed away at a Delhi hospital during treatment.

Different residents have varying opinions on the order, depending on what they want to see in the case, bringing out the sway of caste in the village.

‘Justice not done’

Family members of the victim said justice has not been done and they would knock on the doors of the higher judiciary. Her father asked, “The judgment gives the impression that we tutored our daughter into naming four people for her rape and murder because we had a running feud with the family of the accused and she was having an affair with Sandeep. Why would we do that?”

On the court’s observation that the politicisation of the incident could have pushed the family to change its statement, he said, “It was politicised when the administration cremated our daughter at night without our permission.”

The victim’s elder brother was in the village when the incident happened and had taken her to the police station. He said, “It seems our educational and social backgrounds have not been kept in mind while arriving at the judgment. We were expected to give exact statements every time, which we could not but on our part, we shared information with the authorities as and when my sister told us.”

Reacting to the defence lawyer’s claim that the family was related to the Hathras MP from BJP Rajveer Diler, the latter said it was not true.

“If belonging to the same caste makes us relatives, then we could have also said that the accused were related to the top leadership in the State.”

Seema Kushwaha, the lawyer of the victim’s family, said the order strangely did not take note of her arguments in the court, but only those of the public prosecutor.

“The judgment doesn’t take into account the social stigma involved in such cases and doesn’t talk of how the delay and lapses in the U.P. Police investigation could have weakened the case against the accused. The lapses have been highlighted in the CBI [Central Bureau of Investigation] chargesheet as well. The girl used the word zabardasti (forcibly) in the first video recorded on the day of the incident, but her medical examination for rape happened on September 22 and the samples were collected on September 25. I am surprised that the judge didn’t accept the victim’s dying declaration,” she said.

Ms. Kushwaha added, “We feel that the convict had the intention and motivation to rape and kill, and we will raise the gaps in the judgment in the High Court.”

Accused to fight legally

Meanwhile, the families of the accused feel justice has not been done completely.

Atar Singh, father of the accused Ravi, said, “We still don’t know who killed the girl. The names of our boys were added because the family wanted to make crores. It was the MP’s daughter who made them accuse our sons, and the media ran away with the story. Who will pay for it?”

A relative of the accused Sandeep said, “Our bread earners were in jail, but they [the victim’s family] are living like VIPs under the security cover.” He said the legal battle to have Sandeep acquitted would continue.

Caste pride

Balbir Singh, who belongs to the same caste as Sandeep but had a fallout with his family, said he stood by them because of caste pride. The victim’s father, he said, was a gentle soul. “For decades, they have carried our refuse on their heads and we have always financially helped them. But when the lawyer told us it was a matter of a love affair and there was an exchange of phone calls, we had to stand by the boys.”

Meanwhile, CRPF personnel guarding the victim’s family were curious to know for how long they had to be on duty.

“How long will this continue? We try not to infringe on their privacy, but this is not always possible,” a senior officer said.

“At any given time of the day, at least 16 personnel are on duty. The only parallel is Unnao, where, too, we are providing security to the victim’s family,” he said, referring to the 2017 Unnao case where a 17-year-old girl was allegedly raped by former BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.