HC seeks Centre’s stand on plea against using public servants to promote schemes

The petitioners referred to two communications issued by the CGDA and the DoPT in October

Published - December 05, 2023 01:46 am IST - New Delhi

The plea argued that public servants have been deployed as special officers for showcasing the Centre’s achievements during the ‘Viksit Bharat Sankalp Yatra’ across the country.

The plea argued that public servants have been deployed as special officers for showcasing the Centre’s achievements during the ‘Viksit Bharat Sankalp Yatra’ across the country. | Photo Credit: FILE PHOTO

The Delhi High Court on Monday sought the Centre’s response on a plea opposing the use of public servants and defence personnel for promotion of government schemes and policies.

In their public interest litigation, ex-bureaucrat E.A.S. Sarma and former IIM Ahmedabad Dean Jagdeep S. Chhokar have challenged the communications issued by the Controller General of Defence Accounts (CGDA) on October 9 and the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) on October 17 on publicising the development activities of the Central government.

As per the plea, the CGDA asked various departments — such as the Defence Research and Development Organisation, Sainik School, and National Cadet Corps — to develop ‘selfie-points’ at prominent locations on the themes of their respective achievements. Meanwhile, the DoPT had decided to deploy public servants as special officers for showcasing the Centre’s achievements in the last nine years during the ‘Viksit Bharat Sankalp Yatra’ to be organised across the country from November 20, 2023 to January 25, 2024.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioners, argued that the two communications amounted “to engaging civil servants/defence officers in campaigning for a particular political party, leading to wholesale politicisation of civil/defence services in general”. He also objected to the presence of photographs of the Prime Minister at these exercises.

Opposing the plea, Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma said the petitioners were wrongly assuming that the government was a political party. “Government of India and party are different things. This is pure government and for government. It is permissible. We will take instructions on nine years,” he submitted.

The High Court observed that using the Prime Minister or the Chief Minister’s picture was a norm and these could be seen on top of advertisements, unless the model code of conduct was in force.

Noting that there should not be any objection to a government popularising its welfare schemes, the High Court said, “When miners were trapped in the tunnel... the Indian Army and the NDRF did a phenomenal job. If the Army wants to popularise that, I don’t think there is a problem. There is no political party. There has to be a connection.”

It listed the case for further hearing on January 5 next year.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.