Maken plea: HC seeks govt, DMRC stand

Congress leader has opposed rise in Metro fares; matter listed for September 27

Updated - September 07, 2018 09:09 am IST

Published - September 07, 2018 02:05 am IST - New Delhi

The Congress leader’s counsel told the court that with the second hike in fares last October, the Delhi Metro became the second costliest Metro service in the world, which has defeated its purpose. File Photo: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar

The Congress leader’s counsel told the court that with the second hike in fares last October, the Delhi Metro became the second costliest Metro service in the world, which has defeated its purpose. File Photo: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar

The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought responses from the city government and the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) on Congress leader Ajay Maken’s plea opposing rise in Metro fares and seeking that ticket prices be subsidised.

A Bench of Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice V.K. Rao asked the authorities to indicate their stand on the plea, which has alleged that first rise in fares in May last year led to a decrease in ridership by around three lakh commuters.

Additional buses

The court also sought the Delhi government’s response regarding construction of multilevel parking for additional buses that the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) intends to procure. The Congress leader’s counsel told the court that with the second hike in fares last October, the Delhi Metro became the second costliest Metro service in the world, which has defeated its purpose.

Mr. Maken has claimed in his application that with the last hike in fares, the Delhi Metro earned an average of ₹7.5 extra from each passenger and that with an annual ridership of 100.79 crore, its annual revenue would come to over ₹55 crore.

He said if the Delhi government subsidised the amount, it would make the Metro more affordable and reduce traffic on city roads as well as air pollution levels here.

The minimum and maximum Metro fares in 2009 were ₹8 and ₹30, but last year they were hiked to ₹10 and ₹60 respectively.

On the issue of procuring standard floor buses, the Delhi government told the Bench that since the Supreme Court had allowed it to procure 500 SFBs, the High Court may consider allowing it to procure the remaining 500.

The High Court Bench, however, refrained from issuing any such direction without first going through the government’s plans on how it intends to make the SFBs as well as roads and bus stops in the city accessible to the differently abled.

It directed that an affidavit be filed indicating the government’s plan and listed the matter for further hearing on September 27.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.