/>

Money laundering: Deepak Talwar withdraws plea in HC

Claims his arrest since Jan was illegal

Published - April 05, 2019 01:46 am IST - New Delhi

NEW DELHI, 31/01/2019: Lobbyist Deepak Talwar, arrested in a money laundering case, leaving Patiala House Court after appearing before the court, being produced by the Enforcement Directorate officials in New Delhi on January 31, 2019. 
Photo: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar / The Hindu

NEW DELHI, 31/01/2019: Lobbyist Deepak Talwar, arrested in a money laundering case, leaving Patiala House Court after appearing before the court, being produced by the Enforcement Directorate officials in New Delhi on January 31, 2019. Photo: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar / The Hindu

Deepak Talwar, an accused in a money laundering case, on Thursday withdrew from the Delhi High Court his plea in which he claimed that his arrest since January 30 was illegal.

Talwar’s counsel sought to withdraw the habeas corpus petition while referring to a recent judgment of the Supreme Court.

Habeas corpus petition

The top court had said that a challenge to the order of remand is not to be entertained in a habeas corpus petition — a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or in court, especially to secure his release, unless lawful grounds are shown for his detention.

A Bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Vinod Goel allowed Talwar, a corporate lobbyist, to withdraw the petition and disposed of the matter. Advocate Tanvir Ahmed Mir, appearing for Talwar, said he would file a bail application in the trial court raising the legal and factual issues.

The court was hearing a habeas corpus plea which claimed that his arrest and custody from January 30 onwards was illegal detention. He has alleged that his fundamental rights were violated by the authorities.

The court had on March 27, refused to entertain Talwar’s prayer challenging the Constitutional validity of various provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), including the agency’s power to arrest and burden of proof.

Central government’s standing counsel Amit Mahajan had informed the court that the challenge to sections 19 (power to arrest) and 24 (burden of proof) of the PMLA is pending consideration before the apex court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.