Ernakulam district consumer panel penalises automobile spare parts dealer for not replacing counterfeit products

Published - June 02, 2024 01:17 am IST - KOCHI

The Ernakulam District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission has ordered an automobile spare parts company to compensate a customer for the alleged sale of counterfeit products as original and declining to replace them thus resorting to deficiency of service and unfair trade practice.

The Commission comprising D.B. Binu, president, and members including V. Ramachandran and Sreevidhia T.N. had issued the verdict on a petition filed by Pramodan V.S. of Mazhuvannur against Perumbavoor-based Roots Auto Parts. The complainant, a contract driver, had bought two headlights for ₹5,600 each from the opposite party to resolve the issue of water seeping into the headlight of his vehicle on January 17, 2023. The purchase was made relying on the assurance that they were original products bought out by the automobile company concerned.

However, the problem recurred as water seeped into one of the headlights obscuring visibility. But the establishment declined to replace it. Subsequently, on consulting a workshop, the complainant was told that the headlight was not original. Following this, the complainant petitioned the Commission.

However, the opposite party did not respond to the Commission’s notice. “Given the evidence and the opposite party’s non-compliance, it is clear that the opposite party is liable for the deficiencies in service and the resulting inconvenience and potential danger caused to the complainant. The opposite party must be held accountable for providing a counterfeit product and failing to address the issue upon the complainant’s complaint,” the Commission observed.

The opposite party’s failure to provide a satisfactory resolution or even engage in the proceedings indicates a lack of accountability and disregard for consumer rights. Their inaction supports the complainant’s allegations of fraudulent practice and deficient service, the Commission concluded.

Consequently, the Commission directed the opposite party to replace the headlights, and pay ₹10,000 and ₹5,000 as compensation and towards the cost of litigation.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.