Madras High Court finds man guilty of causing cruelty to animals

The court refuses him interim custody of 36 cows 

Updated - August 20, 2022 11:19 pm IST - MADURAI

The petitioner told the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court that since there was water scarcity in his village, he decided to shift his cows to another place.

The petitioner told the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court that since there was water scarcity in his village, he decided to shift his cows to another place.

Dismissing the petition filed by a man who sought custody of 36 cows, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court held that he was prima facie guilty of causing cruelty to the animals. It is said that he was transporting the cows in a single container.

The court was hearing a criminal revision petition preferred by Krishnamoorthy of Virudhunagar district who challenged the order of the Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai, dismissing his plea seeking return of the 36 cows now entrusted with an animal rescue trust.

It is said that the accused in the case, including the petitioner, were illegally transporting the cows in a vehicle. The vehicle was intercepted and the animals were secured.

The petitioner said he was a farmer and the cows belonged to him. Since there was water scarcity in his village, he decided to shift them to another place in the district.

It was alleged that the cows were being transported to Kerala for slaughtering. A complaint was lodged and a first information report was registered by police, who submitted that the cows were being transported for slaughtering and the Transport of Animals Rules were not followed.

In a counter affidavit, the complainant, Sunitha, submitted that the petitioner was transporting the cows in a container. The legs of the cows were tied and green chillies were applied on their eyes to transport them in a standing position.

The Veterinary Officer who conducted the medical check-up on the cows found many injuries. One of the cows was pregnant and most of the cows were aged below 10 years. Procedures under the Tamil Nadu Animal Preservation Act and the Transport of Animals Rules were not followed.

Justice K. Murali Shankar took note of the fact that no water or food was provided to the 36 cows during the transportation, green chillies were used on their eyes and also they suffered injuries.

The judge said the petitioner was prima facie guilty of causing cruelty to the animals. If the petitioner was finally found to be not guilty, then the issue of custody of the cows would be dealt with in accordance with the rules and regulations, he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.