HC grants pre–arrest bail to BJP MLC

15 criminal cases registered against him, say Mumbai police

Published - April 13, 2022 02:11 am IST - Mumbai

A view of the Bombay High court in Mumbai, Maharashtra.

A view of the Bombay High court in Mumbai, Maharashtra. | Photo Credit: Vivek Bendre

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday granted anticipatory bail to BJP MLC Pravin Dareka in connection with a bank scam.

A single bench of justice Anuja Prabhudessai said, “In the event of arrest, the applicant will be released on a personal bond of ₹50,000.”

Mr. Darekar moved the High Court on March 28 after the special Prevention of Money Laundering Act court rejected his pre–arrest bail.

On March 25, special judge Rahul Rokade held a prima facie case was made out and rejected the pre–arrest bail but granted Mr. Darekar protection from arrest till March 29 for him to approach the High Court.

The case involves forged and fabricated documents submitted by Mr. Darekar on the basis of which he became the member of Pratigya Labour Operative Society which authorised him to represent it in the elections of Mumbai District Co–operative Bank.

The complaint against Mr. Darekar is that he deprived the actual labour from their right to be a member of the society and also by virtue of that became the director the Bank. The Mumbai police told the special court, “There are 15 criminal cases registered against him and this itself disqualifies him from any relief.”

Their affidavit said, “While filing the affidavit in 2016 for MLC elections, Mr. Darekar had mentioned that he and his family own property worth ₹2.13 crore, of which property to the tune of ₹91 lakh belonged to him, and that as a member of the legislative Assembly, he got ₹2.5 lakh per month. Thus, the BJP leader is not a labourer.”

The complainant in the case is Aam Aadmi Party’s leader Dhananjay Shinde. The FIR was registered against Mr. Darekar on March 14 under Sections 199 (false statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as evidence), 200 (using as true such declaration knowing it to be false), 406 (punishment for criminal breach of trust), 417 (punishment for cheating), 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 465 (punishment for forgery) and 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating) of the IPC.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.