Inside Trump’s isolation after Putin meet, walk-backs

Even close aides disagreed with the U.S. President on his Russia remarks

Published - July 21, 2018 09:21 pm IST - BRIDGEWATER

Left alone:  Following his meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump was the most isolated he has been since the Charlottesville controversy.

Left alone: Following his meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump was the most isolated he has been since the Charlottesville controversy.

Facing condemnation from allies and foes alike on Capitol Hill, President Donald Trump was outnumbered even in the Oval Office. Top aides gathered to convince the President to issue a rare walk-back of the comments he’d made raising doubts about U.S. intelligence conclusions of Russian election interference as he stood alongside Vladimir Putin.

Vice-President Mike Pence, National Security Adviser John Bolton and chief of staff John Kelly stood united in the West Wing on Tuesday in their contention that the Commander-in-Chief had some clean-up to do. They brought with them words of alarm from Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, as well as from a host of congressional leaders and supporters of the President for whom Mr. Trump’s public praise of Mr. Putin proved to be a bridge too far.

Even for Mr. Trump, a leader who has increasingly come to cast off the constraints and guidance of aides, the him-against-the-world position proved untenable. Mr. Trump may like doing things his way, eschewing advice and precedent like no President before, but he never likes being alone.

Walking off stage with Mr. Putin following their joint press conference in Helsinki, Mr. Trump was riding high after his second summit with an adversarial leader in as many months. The highly choreographed affairs had been sought out by the U.S. leader as a way to boost his credibility abroad and his favourability at home, and he believed the latest one had accomplished the task. But as Air Force One took off into Finland’s endless sunlight on Monday night, Mr. Trump’s mood darkened. But that was not how it was being portrayed back home.

Negative coverage

On the long flight back to Washington, the President began dialling around to allies and aides and started to stew about negative media coverage, even from usually friendly Fox News, according to five outside allies and Republicans close to the White House not authorised to speak publicly about private conversations.

Mr. Trump rarely takes kindly to direct confrontation but it was a taste of what awaited him on his return in Washington, where stalwart allies like Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich were speaking out.

By the time he arrived home, the parade of critical statements had become a stampede, leaving Mr. Trump the most isolated he’d been in the White House since last year’s controversy over White supremacist protesters in Charlottesville. Some in the President’s circle saw parallels in the response to that incident, when the President walked back on his August comments critical of “both sides” for protests in the Virginia city, only to later revert to his initial position that both White supremacists and their detractors shared blame for the violence.

Mr. Trump waited 27 hours, sent five tweets and sat for two television interviews after his initial comments in Helsinki before claiming he’d used a confusing “double negative” and meant “would” instead of “wouldn’t” in a key sentence at his press conference about who was responsible for election meddling.

Fresh challenge

The next day brought a fresh challenge. Mr. Trump appeared to answer “no” to a reporter’s question asking whether Russia was still targeting the U.S. Hours later, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders emerged to say Mr. Trump had merely tried to put a stop to the questioning by saying “no,” although he continued discussing Russia after that.

As each White House effort to clean up the situation failed to stem the growing bipartisan backlash, Mr. Trump’s mood worsened, according to confidants. He groused about his staff for not better managing the fallout. He was angry at the two American reporters, who asked questions at the Helsinki news conference. And he seethed at the lack of support he believed he received from congressional Republicans.

Also a target of the President’s ire was Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, who issued a rare statement rebutting the President’s Monday comments. But it was Mr. Coats’ televised interview on Thursday that set off the President anew, as the intelligence director questioned the wisdom of the Putin meeting and said he had hoped Mr. Trump wouldn’t meet alone with the Russian leader.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.