/>

Trump dismissive as New York attorney general accuses him of inflating his net worth by $2 billion

Newly released testimony shows Donald Trump defending his real estate empire and his presidency in a face-to-face clash with the New York attorney general suing him for fraud

Published - August 31, 2023 09:25 am IST - NEW YORK

Former U.S. President Donald Trump. File

Former U.S. President Donald Trump. File | Photo Credit: REUTERS

Donald Trump defended his real estate empire and his presidency in a face-to-face clash with the New York attorney general suing him for fraud, testifying at a closed-door grilling in April that his company is flush with cash — and claiming he saved “millions of lives” by deterring nuclear war when he was president.

Mr. Trump, in testimony made public on Wednesday, said it was a “terrible thing” that Attorney General Letitia James was suing him over claims he made on annual financial statements about his net worth and the value of his skyscrapers, golf courses and other assets.

His lawyers released Mr. Trump’s 479-page deposition transcript in a flurry of court filings ahead of a September 22 hearing where a judge could resolve part or all of the lawsuit before it goes to trial in October. Ms. James said evidence shows Mr. Trump fraudulently inflated his net worth by up to 39%, or more than $2 billion, in some years.

Sitting across from Ms. James at her Manhattan office on April 13, Mr. Trump said, “you don’t have a case and you should drop this case.” Noting his contributions to the city’s skyline, Mr. Trump said “it’s a shame” that “now I have to come and justify myself to you.”

Interrogated about the truthfulness of financial statements he gave to banks, Mr. Trump repeatedly insisted that, legally speaking, it didn't matter whether they were accurate or not.

“I have a clause in there that says, ‘Don’t believe the statement. Go out and do your own work.’ This statement is ‘worthless.’ It means nothing,” Mr. Trump testified. Given the disclaimer, he said, “you’re supposed to pay no credence to what we say whatsoever.”

In a legal filing on Wednesday, Ms. James urged Judge Arthur Engoron to grant summary judgment on one of seven claims in her lawsuit — that Mr. Trump and his company defrauded lenders, insurers and others by lying about his wealth and the value of his assets.

To rule, Judge Engoron needs only to answer two questions, Ms. James’ office argued: whether Mr. Trump’s annual financial statements were false or misleading, and whether he and the Trump Organisation used those statements while conducting business transactions.

“The answer to both questions is a resounding ‘yes’ based on the mountain of undisputed evidence” in the case, Ms. James’ special litigation counsel Andrew Amer said in a 100-page summary judgment motion.

Even if Judge Engoron rules on the fraud claim, he would still preside over a non-jury trial on six other remaining claims in the lawsuit if it is not settled.

Mr. Trump’s lawyers are asking Judge Engoron to dismiss the case entirely.

They argue that many of its allegations are barred by a statute of limitations and that Ms. James has no standing to sue because the entities Mr. Trump supposedly defrauded “have never complained, and indeed have profited from their business dealings" with him.

Mr. Trump, the front-runner for the Republican nomination in next year’s presidential election, has been indicted four times in the last five months — accused in Georgia and Washington, D.C., of plotting to overturn his 2020 election loss, in Florida of hoarding classified documents, and in Manhattan of falsifying business records related to hush money paid on his behalf. Some of Mr. Trump’s criminal trials are scheduled to overlap with the presidential primary season.

Ms. James sued Mr. Trump last September, alleging he inflated the value of assets like his Mar-a-Lago estate for at least a decade. Her lawsuit seeks $250 million in penalties and a ban on Mr. Trump doing business in New York.

Mr. Trump testified that he only had the financial statements made so he could see a list of his many properties and said he “never felt that these statements would be taken very seriously," but that financial institutions would occasionally ask for them. Some of the values listed were based on “guesstimates,” he conceded.

Mr. Trump answered questions with such verbosity at the April deposition — veering from evasiveness to bluster to filibuster at times — that one lawyer worried his seven hours of sworn testimony could go until midnight.

It was a reversal from a deposition last year, before Ms. James filed her lawsuit, in which Mr. Trump refused to answer all but a few procedural questions. At that earlier deposition, Mr. Trump invoked his Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination more than 400 times.

Mr. Trump testified in April that his company, the Trump Organisation, has over $400 million in cash. He claimed Mar-a-Lago is worth $1.5 billion and a golf course he owns near Miami is worth $2 billion or $2.5 billion. He said he believes he could sell another golf course he owns in Scotland to the Saudi-backed LIV golf league “for a fortune.”

“Do you know the banks were fully paid? Do you know the banks made a lot of money?" Mr. Trump testified. "Do you know I don’t believe I ever got even a default notice, and even during COVID, the banks were all paid? And yet you’re suing on behalf of banks, I guess. It’s crazy. The whole case is crazy.”

Mr. Trump is not expected to testify in court if the case goes to trial, but video recordings of his depositions could be played.

In his deposition, Mr. Trump testified that once he became President, he stopped paying much attention to his business because he needed to focus on world affairs.

“I think you would have nuclear holocaust if I didn’t deal with North Korea,” Mr. Trump testified. “I think you would have a nuclear war, if I weren’t elected. And I think you might have a nuclear war now, if you want to know the truth.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.