Gautam Navlakha hopes for speedy, fair trial ahead of surrender to NIA

Mr. Navlakha, like activist-academic Anand Teltumbde, has been charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

April 14, 2020 10:07 am | Updated December 03, 2021 06:45 am IST - NEW DELHI

Activist Gautam Navlakha | File

Activist Gautam Navlakha | File

Human rights activist and journalist Gautam Navlakha, who plans to surrender to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Tuesday for his alleged involvement in the Bhima-Koregao riots of 2018, said he hoped for a speedy and fair trial for himself and other co-accused in the case.

“My hope rests on a speedy and fair trial for myself and all my fellow co-accused. This alone will enable me to clear my name, and walk free, having also used the time in jail to rid myself of acquired habits,” Mr. Navlakha said in a statement.

Mr. Navlakha, like activist-academic Anand Teltumbde, who has also been asked to surrender following a Supreme Court order , has been charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

Also read:Day before surrendering to NIA, Anand Teltumbde writes to the people of India

Mr. Navlakha has been associated with the People’s Union for Democratic Rights, a Delhi-based civil rights’ group, and the Mumbai-based Economic & Political Weekly for several decades.

 

“Draconian provisions of UAPA are not accompanied by stricter procedures regarding evidence, especially electronic, considering the stringent punishment provided for under the Act; the procedures, which otherwise provide tighter rules regarding evidence, are instead made elastic. Under this double whammy, jail becomes the norm, and bail an exception. In this Kafkaesque domain, process itself becomes punishment,” Mr. Navlakha stated.

Pointing out that the apex court had itself recently intervened in the matter of jail conditions, and issued guidelines to the authorities regarding the threat to jail inmates due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Mr. Navlakha said, “However, I am affected by the fear that my near and dear ones harbour about my captivity amidst COVID-19. I cannot help but feel disappointed that the terse order of the Supreme Court on 8th April had no reference to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has overtaken the world, including all of us in India.”

Full text of Gautam Navlakha’s statement

As I prepare to Ieave to surrender before the NIA headquarters in Delhi I am glad that Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Indira Banerjee gave me another week of freedom when they passed the order on April 8, 2020. A week of freedom means a lot in my condition, even in the age of lockdown. Their order resolved the predicament I encountered in complying with the March 16th order of the apex court, which obliged me to surrender by April 6th before the NIA, Mumbai. The lockdown that followed prevented me from travelling. Also there was no direction from NIA (Mumbai) regarding what I should do under the circumstances. I know now that I have to surrender myself to the NIA Head quarters in Delhi.

The Indian Prime Minister has likened the challenge posed by Covid19 pandemic to a state of “national emergency”. Meanwhile the apex court itself recently intervened in the matter of jail conditions, and issued guidelines to the authorities regarding the overcrowding of jail inmates and the threat posed to the prisoners and detenues, jail staff and other personnel assigned jail duties. This concern remains although no case of Covid19 infection has come from any jail so far, somewhat reassuring for me. However, I am affected by the fear that my near and dear ones harbour about my captivity amidst Covid19.

I cannot help but feel disappointed that the terse order of the Supreme Court on 8th April had no reference to the Covid19 pandemic, which has overtaken the world, including all of us in India.

However, I can now begin to face the actual legal process, which accompanies cases where provisions of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act are invoked. Such Acts turn the normal jurisprudence upside down. No longer is it the axiom that ‘a person is innocent unless proven guilty’. In fact, under such Acts, ‘an accused is guilty unless proven innocent’.

Draconian provisions of UAPA are not accompanied by stricter procedures regarding evidence, especially electronic, considering the stringent punishment provided for under the Act; the procedures, which otherwise provide tighter rules regarding evidence, are instead made elastic. Under this double whammy, jail becomes the norm, and bail an exception. In this Kafkaesque domain, process itself becomes punishment.

My hope rests on a speedy and fair trial for myself and all my fellow co-accused. This alone will enable me to clear my name, and walk free, having also used the time in jail to rid myself of acquired habits.

Until then,

“Won’t you help to sing

These songs of freedom

‘Cause all I ever have

Redemption songs

Redemption songs.

These songs of Freedom……” (Bob Marley)

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.