Hindenburg Research: Mauritius’ Financial Services Commission says fund at heart of charge against SEBI chief not domiciled in Mauritius

Financial Services Commission says it does not permit creation of shell companies

Financial Services Commission said it had taken cognisance of the contents of the report published by Hindenburg Research which mentioned Mauritius as a ‘tax haven’. Photo: YouTube/@financialservicescommissio64

Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Mauritius on Tuesday (August 13, 2024) said the offshore fund at the heart of the conflict of interest allegation Hindenburg Research levelled against SEBI chief Madhabi Puri Buch is not domiciled in the island nation, and that it does not permit creation of shell companies.

In a statement, the FSC said it had taken cognisance of the contents of the report published by Hindenburg Research on August 10, 2024 wherein mention has been made of ‘Mauritius-based shell entities’ and Mauritius as a ‘tax haven’.

Related Stories

• Hindenburg Research: Allegations against Adani duly investigated; Madhabi Buch disclosed, recused when necessary, says SEBI

  

• SEBI chief Madhabi Buch, husband deny Hindenburg charge as ‘baseless’; Adani Group says allegations ‘malicious, mischievous’

  

• Adani Group denies ‘malicious, mischievous’ Hindenburg allegations, says company has no commercial relationship with SEBI chief

  

• Adani case: Supreme Court had said it can transfer probe if bias found

  

• SEBI chief’s rebuttal confirms ‘massive conflict of interest’, raises fresh questions: Hindenburg Research

  

• Who is Madhabi Puri Buch, the markets regulator under attack from Hindenburg?

  

• Hindenburg Research report on SEBI chief raises political storm

  

“The report of Hindenburg has further cited ‘IPE Plus Fund’ is a small offshore Mauritius Fund and ‘IPE Plus Fund 1, a fund registered in Mauritius’. We wish to clarify that IPE Plus Fund and IPE Plus Fund 1 are not licensees of the FSC and are not domiciled in Mauritius,” it said.

Hindenburg on Saturday (August 3, 2024) alleged that SEBI chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch and her husband opened an account in 2015 with a wealth management firm in Singapore to invest an undisclosed sum of money in a Mauritius-registered offshoot of a Bermuda-based fund.

The Mauritian fund was run by an Adani director and its ultimate parent was the vehicle used by two Adani associates to round-trip funds and inflate stock prices.

FSC, the integrated regulator for the non-bank financial services sector and global business, denied the fund being registered in Mauritius.

Related Stories

• Hindenburg allegations against SEBI chief casts an ‘atmosphere of doubt’, direct completion of probe against Adani group, plea asks Supreme Court

  

• Hindenburg Research vs SEBI’s Madhabi Buch: How the row unfolded

  

• ‘Strictest’ action will be taken against Hindenburg: Union Minister Giriraj Singh

  

• Hindenburg report on SEBI chief: Congress threatens nationwide stir if JPC demand not met

  

FSC said the legislative framework in Mauritius does not permit the creation of shell companies.

Strict monitoring

“Mauritius has a robust framework for global business companies. All global business companies licensed by the FSC have to meet substance requirements on an ongoing basis as per Section 71 of the Financial Services Act, which is strictly monitored by the FSC,” the FSC said.

FSC stated that Mauritius strictly complies with international best practices and has been rated as compliant with the standards of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

“As per the peer review conducted by the OECD Forum on Harmful Tax Practices, the OECD is satisfied that Mauritius does not have any harmful features in its tax regimes, thus recognising Mauritius as a well-regulated, transparent and compliant jurisdiction. Therefore, Mauritius cannot be termed a tax haven,” it added.