HC: Don’t take steps based on wildlife board recommendation

Decision-making process in meeting of wildlife board calls for closer scrutiny: HC

Published - June 18, 2020 11:24 pm IST - Bengaluru

The High Court of Karnataka on Thursday directed that no further steps should be taken based on the recommendation, made by the State Board for Wild Life (SBWL) headed by the Chief Minister, on proposal for diversion of 595.64 hectares of forest for the new Hubballi-Ankola broad gauge railway line project.

The court said the decision-making process in the 14th meeting of SBWL held on March 11 calls for closer scrutiny as the decision was taken by allowing non-member Ministers to participate in the meeting, which was held merely 11 days after the 13th meeting, held on March 9, 2020, in which it was unanimously decided to reject the proposal.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice Nataraj Rangaswamy passed the interim order on a petition filed by the Project Vruksha Foundation, Bengaluru.

The Bench noted that Chief Minister B.S. Yeddyurappa, as the chairperson of the Board, had agreed with the unanimous decision but convened the another meeting within 11 days and invited his Cabinet colleagues — Jagadish Shettar, Minister for Large and Medium Industries, and Shivaram Hebbar, Minister for Labour and Sugar — as special invitees to the meeting.

One of the Ministers, Mr. Shetter, addressed the meeting though he was not a member, and the State Chief Secretary, T.M. Vijay Bhaskar, who was also a special invitee, had requested the Board to recommend the project for the National Board for Wildlife, the Bench noted. Former Minister and Haliyal MLA R.V. Deshpande was another special invitee.

It was contended in the petition that participation of non-members of the Board vitiated the decision making process as it violated the provisions of the Karnataka State Board for Wild Life Rules, 2006.

Also, it was pointed out in the petition that the chairperson of the Board has no power under the Wildlife (Protection) Act to overrule the unanimous decision taken in the previous meeting of the Board.

The petitioner contended that the unanimous decision taken in the 13th meeting of the Board was lawful and was in the interest of protecting the Western Ghats and wildlife.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.