Supreme Court seeks Shah Jahan’s ‘signature’ in Taj Mahal case

Waqf board told to prove ownership.

Published - April 11, 2018 09:50 pm IST - New Delhi

This photograph taken on January 3, 2018 shows a general view of the Taj Mahal in Agra.


India is to restrict the number of daily visitors to the Taj Mahal in an effort to preserve the iconic 17th-century monument to love, its biggest tourist draw. Millions of mostly Indian tourists visit the Taj Mahal every year and their numbers are increasing steadily as domestic travel becomes more accessible. / AFP PHOTO / Dominique Faget

This photograph taken on January 3, 2018 shows a general view of the Taj Mahal in Agra. India is to restrict the number of daily visitors to the Taj Mahal in an effort to preserve the iconic 17th-century monument to love, its biggest tourist draw. Millions of mostly Indian tourists visit the Taj Mahal every year and their numbers are increasing steadily as domestic travel becomes more accessible. / AFP PHOTO / Dominique Faget

The Supreme Court has asked the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Waqf Board to show documents signed by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan to prove its claim that it owns the iconic Taj Mahal.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra asked the board counsel to show it documents to substantiate that Shah Jahan, who had built the Taj Mahal in memory of his wife Mumtaz Mahal in 1631, had executed a ‘waqfnama’ in favour of the board.

Waqfnama is a deed or a document through which a person expresses intention to donate a property or land for charitable purposes or waqf.

“Who in India will believe that it [Taj] belongs to the waqf board,” asked the Bench, comprising Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud, and added that such issues must not waste the time of the apex court.

When the waqf board counsel told the court that Shah Jahan had himself declared it a waqf property, the Bench asked the board to show it the original deed executed by the Mughal emperor.

“Show us the signature,” the CJI told counsel, who then sought more time to produce relevant documents.

ASI appeal

The court was hearing a 2010 appeal filed by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) over the ownership of the historic monument against the waqf board’s decision to declare the Taj Mahal as its property.

The Bench also asked counsel how Shah Jahan could sign a document when he was imprisoned by his son Aurangzeb at the Agra Fort in 1658 after a bitter war of succession. Shah Jahan died in 1666 in the fort itself.

It told counsel that the 17th century monument and other heritage structures, built by the Mughals, were taken over by the British after the Mughal rule. After India’s independence, the monuments came under the Government of India and were being managed by the ASI.

The ASI counsel also maintained that there was no waqfnama.The court posted the matter to April 17.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.