Supreme Court to hear PIL on food security for all

Court to consider Jairam Ramesh’s plea over ‘acute food shortage’ today.

Updated - December 03, 2021 06:34 am IST

Published - May 04, 2020 11:10 pm IST - New Delhi

Jairam Ramesh

Jairam Ramesh

The Supreme Court is set to hear on Tuesday a public interest litigation petition filed by Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh seeking universal coverage under the Public Distribution System and food security for all amid an “acute food shortage” due to the ongoing nationwide lockdown.

The lockdown to contain the spread of coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) pandemic was imposed on March 25 and has been extended twice. It has now been extended up to May 17, though most restrictions have been lifted in designated green zones — districts that have remained free of a new case of infection for the last 21 days.

In his PIL petition, Mr. Ramesh has sought relaxations in the requirement of ration cards for supply of rations under the Public Distribution System during the coronavirus pandemic in order to help mitigate the food shortages and prevent deaths of the poor.

Lockdown displaces lakhs of migrants

He has argued that there have been numerous deaths due to starvation since the commencement of the lockdown and that there are many marginalised sections of people who are not covered under the National Food Security Act and in dire need of rations.

Any alternative remedy at this stage would take a long time, which could further accentuate food shortages and lead to wide-scale starvation deaths, Mr. Ramesh has contended.

“It may be further appreciated that this Hon’ble Court has, in the past, suspended the requirement of releasing rations against ration cards in situations of drought, etc. in Swaraj Abhiyan II v. Union of India,(2016) 7 SCC 498,” he said in the petition. In the 2016 judgement, the SC had ruled that “it would be inappropriate for the State Governments to deprive any household in drought affected areas of the requisite food grains merely because they do not have a ration card”. The apex court had held that the ration card could be substituted by a valid identity card or any proof of residence.

 

The Congress MP has further argued that the Supreme Court had on earlier occasions observed that the right to life, enshrined under Article 21, implies the right to food, water, a decent environment, education, medical care and shelter, and is intrinsic to our survival.

Mr. Ramesh asserted that by not ensuring access to food for all, the State was violating the fundamental right of food guaranteed to citizens under the National Food Security Act.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.