ADVERTISEMENT

Madras High Court rejects Vedanta’s plea to reopen Sterlite copper plant

Updated - August 18, 2020 01:21 pm IST - CHENNAI

In their judgement running to 815 pages, the judges agreed that the prohibitory orders had been rightly passed for violation of laws relating to pollution control

CPI (M) cadres distributing sweets near Rajaji Park in Thoothukudi on Tuesday welcoming the High Court’s verdict

The Madras High Court on Tuesday rejected a plea by natural resources company Vedanta seeking permission to reopen its Sterlite copper smelting plant in Thoothukudi . The plant was sealed by the Tamil Nadu government on May 28, 2018 due to environmental concerns.

Justices T.S. Sivagnanam and V. Bhavani Subbaroyan dismissed all 10 writ petitions filed by Vedanta challenging various orders passed by the State government and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) refusing consent to operate, to stop production, to disconnect electricity and to seal the premises.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Hindu explains: Sterlite protests

ADVERTISEMENT

In their judgment running to 815 pages, the judges agreed with Advocate General Vijay Narayan for the State and senior counsel C.S. Vaidyanathan, representing TNPCB, that the prohibitory orders had been rightly passed for violation of the laws relating to pollution control.

After the delivery of the verdict, senior counsel C. Aryama Sundaram, representing Vedanta, urged the court to order status quo for three, or at least two weeks, so that nothing adverse takes place until the judgement could be taken on appeal to the Supreme Court.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the judges refused to pass any such order. The senior judge in the Bench said it may not be appropriate to add anything after they had delivered their verdict. He said, the verdict would have been delivered in March itself but for the pandemic.

He told the lawyers that the judgement was dictated to three different personal assistants over the phone before everything could be collated and corrected. It was an enormous effort, given that the lawyers argued the case for 42 days and submitted voluminous documents running to thousands of pages.

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

Stories in this Package

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT