Plea in Madras High Court seeks to declare liquor rules amendment in T.N. as illegal, unconstitutional

Litigant K. Balu says the minimum distance to be maintained between liquor shops and educational institutions and places of worship will go for a toss if it was served at marriage halls and convention centres

Updated - April 25, 2023 01:03 pm IST

Published - April 24, 2023 11:18 am IST - CHENNAI

Photograph used for representational purposes only. File

Photograph used for representational purposes only. File | Photo Credit: SUBRAMANIUM S

A public interest litigation petition has been filed in the Madras High Court to declare illegal and unconstitutional an amendment made to the Tamil Nadu Liquor (License and permit) Rules, 1981 on March 18 for issuing special licences to serve liquor to guests during household celebrations, functions and parties, and certain events organised on commercial premises such as conference halls, convention centres, marriage halls, banquet halls and sports stadiums.

Click here to read the notification issued by the T.N. Home, Prohibition and Excise Department in March 2023

Advocates Forum for Social Justice president K. Balu filed the case on the ground that the law-enforcing agency would find it difficult to control the nuisance caused by those who consume liquor if special licences were issued for serving liquor on public and private premises.

He urged the court to stay the operation of the amendment till a final decision is made on his plea for a writ of declaration after granting an opportunity to the government to file its counter-affidavit.

In his affidavit, the petitioner claimed that Tamil Nadu was an alcohol-free State till 1971. However, from 2003, the State government began enjoying a monopoly over wholesale as well as retail business of liquor through the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (Tasmac).

“The police, tasked with maintaining law and order, do not raise even a whimper of a protest when Tasmac establishes liquor shops and bars even in residential localities,” he complained.

On the other hand, the police handle those protesting against such liquor shops ruthlessly, he claimed. Recalling that the High Court had elaborately dealt with the evils of liquor consumption in a judgment delivered on May 11, 2017, the litigant said that despite such judicial pronouncements, the government had decided to issue special licences for serving liquor on commercial premises such as marriage halls and even for household celebrations, functions and parties.

Since many marriage halls and banquet halls were situated in residential areas, it would cause a great amount of annoyance to the residents, he said.

Pointing out that Tasmac was mandated to maintain a minimum distance between liquor shops and places of worship and educational institutions, he said these stipulations would go for a toss if serving liquor was permitting in convention centres, conference halls, marriage halls, banquet halls and sports stadiums.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.