Vellore ‘burial’ incident exposes shortcomings of govt. schemes

Updated - November 28, 2021 10:18 am IST - CHENNAI

The recent controversy over the denial of access for a Scheduled Caste family to a burial ground in Vellore district has exposed shortcomings in the government schemes for the purpose of creating burial grounds and laying pathways to such places, activists say.

The State government’s Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department implements two schemes, one of which deals with the provision of land for burial grounds and formation of pathways to the grounds. Another scheme pertains to laying link roads to habitations of the SCs and pathways to burial grounds. Of the two, the former gets higher allocation of funds than the latter. For the current year, ₹75.84 lakh has been set apart for the two schemes put together.

D. Ravi Kumar, VCK general secretary, says the Vellore episode is only a symptom of the deeper problem that affects the SCs. The two schemes and many others, meant for the welfare of the community, are being implemented “rather mechanically”. What is required is a ‘proactive’ approach, he contends. He says that invariably, the burial grounds for SCs are located on ‘poramboke’ lands without direct control of the local bodies. In Karnataka, all burial grounds for SCs come under the supervision of the authorities. This model can be replicated in T.N., he suggests.

K. Jayakumar, TNCC working president, says that to eliminate the problem, the government could either ask the SCs to submit petitions, mentioning their requirements for burial grounds, or direct Tahsildars and other field officials to furnish full details of the locations of burial grounds for the SCs and present proposals for new facilities.

Amshan Kumar, director of the film Manusangada , which was based on an incident of denial of access to a burial ground in Nagapattinam district in January 2016, says only strict enforcement of laws meant for the welfare of the SCs, coupled with the media’s sustained focus on issues concerning them, will ensure a qualitative change in the situation.

When his reaction was sought to criticism about the efficacy of the government schemes in light of the Vellore incident, Fisheries Minister D. Jayakumar said that since the matter was ‘sub-judice’, he would not like to comment.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.