Telegram removes paywall posts from iOS app, report

Telegram CEO, Pavel Durov, said users have been using pay-to-view and donation bots to set up paywall posts, which Apple did not approve 

Published - October 31, 2022 04:56 pm IST

Telegram CEO, Pavel Durov, said users have been using pay-to-view and donation bots to set up paywall posts, which Apple did not approve 

Telegram CEO, Pavel Durov, said users have been using pay-to-view and donation bots to set up paywall posts, which Apple did not approve  | Photo Credit: Reuters

Telegram removed pay-to-view posts that allowed users on its iOS app to monetize posts, according to a report from 9to5Mac.

(For insights on emerging themes at the intersection of technology, business and policy, subscribe to our tech newsletter Today’s Cache.)

The report stated Telegram had been testing a paid posts feature. But had to remove it due to Apple’s strict App Store guidelines that do not allow developers to use third-party payment processors.

In a statement to 9to5Mac, Telegram said that the platform was not testing the feature and users had been taking advantage of third-party payment bots to add paywall posts.

Telegram CEO Pavel Durov, in a post, said creators on the platform have been using third-party payment or donation bots to sell access to certain posts and that, Apple was “not happy with content creators monetizing their efforts without paying a 30% tax to Apple.”

Durov also called upon regulators in the EU and India to take action against Apple for its high commission fee in its App Store policy that he says “destroys more dreams and crushes more entrepreneurs with a tax that is higher than any government-levied VAT.”

Earlier this year, Durov criticised Apple, blaming it for delaying updates for weeks.

Telegram. In June, brought Telemoji, and premium subscriptions that cost ₹460 per month. The price of the subscriptions has been cut down to ₹ 179 per month now.

Last week, Spotify also criticised Apple for making it difficult to sell audiobooks to its users saying the company’s “anti-competitive behaviour” was hurting everyone including audiobook listeners, publishers, and authors.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.